I out nerded myself, just for clarification I'm Foxxxdude

• @bingin15 Now about question :

  Who says it needs a cause ? Physics is full of things that happen without anything causing them, for example radioactive decay. If you have a certain maount of atoms you can say that after such an such time so an so many atoms will have decayed, but its impossible to say when a certain one of them will decay.It happens completely random, without anything causing it

  Matter can be created from the vacuum,something we can observe directly,no catalyst needed.

  MrRichardQED 2 days ago
• @MrRichardQED lmao! you know in the video he says ask a creationalist about the other laws of thermodynamics: The first law of thermodynamics is that energy cannot be created or destroyed. Now taking from a very clever man it is commonly accepted that E=MC^2.

  So it is not entirely ridiculous to assume that matter may share a similar relationship, but don't take my word for it look up lavoisier, with regards to his discovery on the law of conservation of mass.

  foxxxdude 2 hours ago
• @foxxxdude You know since i write quite a few comments a day, its a good idea to quote a few words of my post, so i actually know to what you are referring ;)

  QUOTE:"to assume that matter may share a similar relationship, "

  What do you mean "share a similar relationship" ? If you would understand that formula correct you would know that matter and energy are one and the same thing, matter is nothing but a lot of energy concentrated in a small point in spacetime. QUESTIONS ?

  MrRichardQED 2 hours ago
• @MrRichardQED So you agree that matter cannot be created or destroyed? do you form arguments based on a random number generator because you make no sense? Do you read what you write? Are you aware that you contradict yourself? You sir are a joke, and do try to leave the poor caps lock key alone you've worn the poor thing out.

  foxxxdude 2 minutes ago

Atheists

Why are you so angry?
I hope you all feel better.
love Diablow.

(x